<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>National Senior Citizens Law Center &#187; Court Access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/tag/court-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nsclc.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:32:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Court House Door Stays Open, But It’s Not Over Yet</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-court-house-door-stays-open-but-its-not-over-yet/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-court-house-door-stays-open-but-its-not-over-yet</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-court-house-door-stays-open-but-its-not-over-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this blog, Rochelle Bobroff outlines the good, bad and ugly parts of the Douglas v ILC decision on Februrary 22,2012. America Constitution Society Blog]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-court-house-door-stays-open-but-its-not-over-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACS Blog: Liberal Justices Miss the Point</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blog-liberal-justices-miss-the-point/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=acs-blog-liberal-justices-miss-the-point</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blog-liberal-justices-miss-the-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=1099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Directing Attorney Rochelle Bobroff writes: &#8220;None of the present members of the Court have taken on his role of objecting to the conservative assault on court access to enforce civil rights, consumer protection, and safety net statutes. Their relative silence &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blog-liberal-justices-miss-the-point/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blog-liberal-justices-miss-the-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 1983 and Preemption: Alternative Means of Court Access for Safety Net Statutes</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/section-1983-and-preemption-alternative-means-of-court-access-for-safety-net-statutes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=section-1983-and-preemption-alternative-means-of-court-access-for-safety-net-statutes</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/section-1983-and-preemption-alternative-means-of-court-access-for-safety-net-statutes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preemption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=1865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tract: While prior scholarship has noted changes in §1983 jurisprudence, this article demonstrates that the current state of the law reflects the transformation of dissents, particularly the dissent written by Justice O’Connor in 1987, into a majority opinion in 2002. &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/section-1983-and-preemption-alternative-means-of-court-access-for-safety-net-statutes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/section-1983-and-preemption-alternative-means-of-court-access-for-safety-net-statutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>