<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>National Senior Citizens Law Center &#187; Clark v Astrue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/tag/clark-v-astrue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nsclc.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:32:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SSA Instructions to ALJs on Clark v Astrue</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/ssa-instructions-to-aljs-on-clark-v-astrue/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ssa-instructions-to-aljs-on-clark-v-astrue</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/ssa-instructions-to-aljs-on-clark-v-astrue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark v Astrue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=5001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(5/9/2011) The instructions are similar to those contained in EM-11032 issued last month which instructed SSA field offices that pursuant to the decision in Clark, benefits would no longer be suspended or denied solely on the basis of a warrant &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/ssa-instructions-to-aljs-on-clark-v-astrue/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/ssa-instructions-to-aljs-on-clark-v-astrue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clark v Astrue Court Order Restoring Benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-order/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clark-v-astrue-court-order</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Security Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark v Astrue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many as 140,000 Americans nationwide will get their Social Security or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits restored as a result of an order issed by Judge Sidney H. Stein in a federal court in Manhattan April 13, 2012. READ &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-order/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clark v Astrue: Court Restores Benefits for Thousands</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-restores-benefits-for-thousands/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clark-v-astrue-court-restores-benefits-for-thousands</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-restores-benefits-for-thousands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark v Astrue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(U.S. District Court/Southern District of New York) &#8212; As many as 140,000 Americans nationwide will get their Social Security or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits restored as a result of an order issued by Judge Sidney H. Stein in a &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-restores-benefits-for-thousands/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-restores-benefits-for-thousands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clark v. Astrue: Nationwide Class Certified</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-nationwide-class-certified/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clark-v-astrue-nationwide-class-certified</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-nationwide-class-certified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Security Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark v Astrue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NATIONWIDE CLASS CERTIFIED IN SSA PROBATION/PAROLE CASE A court in New York has certified a nationwide class in a successful challenge to the Social Security Administration’s policy of suspending or denying Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits whenever &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-nationwide-class-certified/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-nationwide-class-certified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clark v Astrue: Plaintiffs Move for Class Certification in SSA Probation Case</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-plaintiffs-move-for-class-certification-in-ssa-probation-case/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clark-v-astrue-plaintiffs-move-for-class-certification-in-ssa-probation-case</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-plaintiffs-move-for-class-certification-in-ssa-probation-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 18:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Security Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark v Astrue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plaintiffs have moved for certification of a nationwide class in Clark v. Astrue, (06-cv-15521 SHS, SDNY). the action challenging the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) policy of suspending or denying Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits anytime someone had an &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-plaintiffs-move-for-class-certification-in-ssa-probation-case/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-plaintiffs-move-for-class-certification-in-ssa-probation-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clark v Astrue: Court of Appeals Rules SSA Policy on Probation/Parole Violators Unlawful</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-of-appeals-rules-ssa-policy-on-probation-parole-violators-unlawful/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clark-v-astrue-court-of-appeals-rules-ssa-policy-on-probation-parole-violators-unlawful</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-of-appeals-rules-ssa-policy-on-probation-parole-violators-unlawful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Security Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark v Astrue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled that the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) policy of suspending Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits whenever someone has an outstanding warrant for an alleged violation of probation &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-of-appeals-rules-ssa-policy-on-probation-parole-violators-unlawful/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-of-appeals-rules-ssa-policy-on-probation-parole-violators-unlawful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSCLC Challenges SSA Policy on Alleged Probation Violation</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/challenges-ssa-policy-on-alleged-probation-violation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=challenges-ssa-policy-on-alleged-probation-violation</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/challenges-ssa-policy-on-alleged-probation-violation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supplemental Security Income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark v Astrue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lawsuit has been filed by NSCLC on behalf of a nationwide class of thousands of individuals, who have lost their Social Security or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits, challenging the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) policy of suspending or denying &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/challenges-ssa-policy-on-alleged-probation-violation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/challenges-ssa-policy-on-alleged-probation-violation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>