<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>National Senior Citizens Law Center &#187; Affordable Care Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/tag/affordable-care-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nsclc.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:32:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Importance of Health Care Access Among Hispanic Older Adults</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-importance-of-health-care-access-among-hispanic-older-adults/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-importance-of-health-care-access-among-hispanic-older-adults</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-importance-of-health-care-access-among-hispanic-older-adults/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare Part D]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=5995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[December 13, 2012 Statement for Capitol Hill Briefing “The Importance of Health Care Access Among Hispanic Older Adults” Fay Gordon, Staff Attorney Hello, thank you for inviting the National Senior Citizens Law Center to participate in this timely and important &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-importance-of-health-care-access-among-hispanic-older-adults/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-importance-of-health-care-access-among-hispanic-older-adults/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Defense of Don Verrilli:  Why the Solicitor General Actually Did a Great Job Defending Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/in-defense-of-don-verrilli-why-the-solicitor-general-actually-did-a-great-job-defending-obamacare/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=in-defense-of-don-verrilli-why-the-solicitor-general-actually-did-a-great-job-defending-obamacare</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/in-defense-of-don-verrilli-why-the-solicitor-general-actually-did-a-great-job-defending-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this blog for the New Republic, Simon Lazarus defends the Solicitor&#8217;s defense of the Affordable Care Act before the Supreme Court. Read the blog and comment.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/in-defense-of-don-verrilli-why-the-solicitor-general-actually-did-a-great-job-defending-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amicus Brief: National Federation of Independent Businesses et al v Sebelius et al / State of Florida et al v DHHS et al</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/amicus-brief-natl-fed-of-independent-businesses-v-sebelius-state-of-florida-v-dhhs/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=amicus-brief-natl-fed-of-independent-businesses-v-sebelius-state-of-florida-v-dhhs</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/amicus-brief-natl-fed-of-independent-businesses-v-sebelius-state-of-florida-v-dhhs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this joint Supreme Court friend of the court brief submitted on January 30, 2012, it is argued that the provisions of the Affordable Care Act affecting those over age 65 should not be affected if the minimum coverage provision is &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/amicus-brief-natl-fed-of-independent-businesses-v-sebelius-state-of-florida-v-dhhs/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/amicus-brief-natl-fed-of-independent-businesses-v-sebelius-state-of-florida-v-dhhs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Individual Mandate Supported in Supreme Court Amicus Brief</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/individual-mandate-supported-in-supreme-court-amicus-brief/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=individual-mandate-supported-in-supreme-court-amicus-brief</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/individual-mandate-supported-in-supreme-court-amicus-brief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In a Supreme Court amicus brief submitted January 11, 2012, National Senior Citizens Law Center’s Rochelle Bobroff, acting as Counsel of Record, writes that that the Affordable Care Act’s minimum coverage provision or individual mandate “falls squarely within Congress’ authority to &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/individual-mandate-supported-in-supreme-court-amicus-brief/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/individual-mandate-supported-in-supreme-court-amicus-brief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hertz or Avis? Progressives&#8217; Quest to Reclaim the Constitution and the Courts</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hertz-or-avis-progressives-quest-to-reclaim-the-constitution-and-the-courts/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hertz-or-avis-progressives-quest-to-reclaim-the-constitution-and-the-courts</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hertz-or-avis-progressives-quest-to-reclaim-the-constitution-and-the-courts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this Ohio State Law Journal article, Simon Lazarus details the challenges posed by the “increasingly reactionary and radical conservative agenda” in relation to the role of the Constitution and the courts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hertz-or-avis-progressives-quest-to-reclaim-the-constitution-and-the-courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hand Wringing on Health Care</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hand-wringing-on-health-care/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hand-wringing-on-health-care</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hand-wringing-on-health-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SLATE (1/9/2012). By Simon Lazarus. Hand Wringing on Health Care.  Republican appointees have concluded that upholding the ACA mandate is compelled by the text of the Commerce Clause and Supreme Court precedent, that it is no more “coercive” than other measures, &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hand-wringing-on-health-care/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hand-wringing-on-health-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Medicaid Ambush</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-medicaid-ambush-the-supreme-courts/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-medicaid-ambush-the-supreme-courts</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-medicaid-ambush-the-supreme-courts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SLATE,  The Medicaid Ambush (11/14/11) The Supreme Court&#8217;s unexpected and astounding reasons for wanting to hear a challenge to Obamacare.  By Simon Lazarus and Dahlia Lithwick. The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a challenge to the Affordable Care Act, &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-medicaid-ambush-the-supreme-courts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-medicaid-ambush-the-supreme-courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comments on Medicaid Program: Eligibility Changes under the Affordable Care Act</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/comments-on-medicaid-program-eligibility-changes-under-the-affordable-care-act/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=comments-on-medicaid-program-eligibility-changes-under-the-affordable-care-act</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/comments-on-medicaid-program-eligibility-changes-under-the-affordable-care-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Reform Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare Part D]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=3876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In comments made to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, NSCLC makes several recommendations related to how states comply with screening requirements of Medicare Part D’s low-income subsidy and several other sections.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/comments-on-medicaid-program-eligibility-changes-under-the-affordable-care-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>