On April 25, 2011, less than a week after issuing the VOPA decision (see our blog here), the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Indiana Family and Social Services Administration v. Indiana Protection and Advocacy Services. 2011 WL 1529809. The en banc Seventh Circuit had ruled in favor of IPAS, holding that there was an implied private right of action in the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act (PAIMI) for the P&A program to seek peer review records of treatment of mentally ill patients from a state hospital. 603 F.3d 365 (7th Cir. Apr. 22, 2010) (see our posting here). If the Supreme Court had affirmed the Fourth Circuit in VOPA, then the Seventh Circuit’s decision in IPAS would have been in line for reversal, because IPAS, like VOPA, was established as a state agency. While the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Fourth Circuit in VOPA did not address the implied private right of action issue decided in IPAS, the denial of certiorari leaves the en banc Seventh Circuit’s wonderful ruling intact. Seth Galanter of Morrison Foerster represented IPAS as well as VOPA.
-
Read our 2011 Annual Report
In The News
California Approved Poor Performing Health Plans for Dual Eligibles (5/2/2012) A special NSCLC report raises concern about the eight health plans the state has selected… Visit News Releases
NSCLC Helps
Elaine Clark began receiving Social Security Disability Insurance in 1996 when she was diagnosed with end-stage renal disease. In January of that year, retroactive to January 2005, the Social Security Administration unlawfully stopped paying her benefits based on an outstanding warrant.. READ MORE
Issues
Adult Day Health Care Affordable Care Act Amicus Brief assisted living chained CPI Clark v Astrue court access dual eligibles Health Care Reform home and community based services IHSS language access LGBT long term care Medi-Cal Medicaid Medicare Medicare Part D nursing homes Olmstead Preemption Social Security SSI Supreme Court




