<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>National Senior Citizens Law Center &#187; Articles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/category/federal-rights/articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nsclc.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:32:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Slate: The Temptations of the Court</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/slate-the-temptations-of-the-court/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=slate-the-temptations-of-the-court</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/slate-the-temptations-of-the-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(3/27/2012) Simon Lazarus. By the third day of Supreme Court arguments over the Affordable Care Act, people may be inclined to tune out. They shouldn’t. The final hour may be of far greater consequence than anything else the court hears &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/slate-the-temptations-of-the-court/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/slate-the-temptations-of-the-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Court House Door Stays Open, But It’s Not Over Yet</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-court-house-door-stays-open-but-its-not-over-yet/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-court-house-door-stays-open-but-its-not-over-yet</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-court-house-door-stays-open-but-its-not-over-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this blog, Rochelle Bobroff outlines the good, bad and ugly parts of the Douglas v ILC decision on Februrary 22,2012. America Constitution Society Blog]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-court-house-door-stays-open-but-its-not-over-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hertz or Avis? Progressives&#8217; Quest to Reclaim the Constitution and the Courts</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hertz-or-avis-progressives-quest-to-reclaim-the-constitution-and-the-courts/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hertz-or-avis-progressives-quest-to-reclaim-the-constitution-and-the-courts</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hertz-or-avis-progressives-quest-to-reclaim-the-constitution-and-the-courts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this Ohio State Law Journal article, Simon Lazarus details the challenges posed by the “increasingly reactionary and radical conservative agenda” in relation to the role of the Constitution and the courts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hertz-or-avis-progressives-quest-to-reclaim-the-constitution-and-the-courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hand Wringing on Health Care</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hand-wringing-on-health-care/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hand-wringing-on-health-care</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hand-wringing-on-health-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SLATE (1/9/2012). By Simon Lazarus. Hand Wringing on Health Care.  Republican appointees have concluded that upholding the ACA mandate is compelled by the text of the Commerce Clause and Supreme Court precedent, that it is no more “coercive” than other measures, &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hand-wringing-on-health-care/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/hand-wringing-on-health-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Medicaid Ambush</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-medicaid-ambush-the-supreme-courts/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-medicaid-ambush-the-supreme-courts</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-medicaid-ambush-the-supreme-courts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SLATE,  The Medicaid Ambush (11/14/11) The Supreme Court&#8217;s unexpected and astounding reasons for wanting to hear a challenge to Obamacare.  By Simon Lazarus and Dahlia Lithwick. The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a challenge to the Affordable Care Act, &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-medicaid-ambush-the-supreme-courts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/the-medicaid-ambush-the-supreme-courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACS Blog: Gloves Off: Justices Ask Pointed Questions in Opening Day Case on Court Access</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-gloves-off-justices-ask-pointed-questions-in-opening-day-case-on-court-access/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=acs-gloves-off-justices-ask-pointed-questions-in-opening-day-case-on-court-access</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-gloves-off-justices-ask-pointed-questions-in-opening-day-case-on-court-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=3848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(October 4, 2011) Rochelle Bobroff writes on the Douglas v. ILC oral argument. The Supreme Court justices started the new court term with piercing questions to all the attorneys arguing the opening case, which presents an important court access issue.  &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-gloves-off-justices-ask-pointed-questions-in-opening-day-case-on-court-access/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-gloves-off-justices-ask-pointed-questions-in-opening-day-case-on-court-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACS Blog: In Under-Reported D.C. Circuit Oral Argument, Prominent Republican Judges Suggest Novel Arguments for Upholding Health Care Law&#8217;s Individual Mandate</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blog-in-under-reported-d-c-circuit-oral-argument-prominent-republican-judges-suggest-novel-arguments-for-upholding-health-care-laws-individual-mandate/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=acs-blog-in-under-reported-d-c-circuit-oral-argument-prominent-republican-judges-suggest-novel-arguments-for-upholding-health-care-laws-individual-mandate</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blog-in-under-reported-d-c-circuit-oral-argument-prominent-republican-judges-suggest-novel-arguments-for-upholding-health-care-laws-individual-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(9/26/11) Simon Lazarus writes that the two Republicans on the three-judge panel, Reagan appointee Laurence Silberman and Bush II appointee Brett Kavanaugh, displayed in-depth grasp and even sympathy for arguments supporting the mandate&#8230;At a minimum, neither judge showed an appetite &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blog-in-under-reported-d-c-circuit-oral-argument-prominent-republican-judges-suggest-novel-arguments-for-upholding-health-care-laws-individual-mandate/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blog-in-under-reported-d-c-circuit-oral-argument-prominent-republican-judges-suggest-novel-arguments-for-upholding-health-care-laws-individual-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACS Blog:Opening Day at the Supreme Court Could Shut Courthouse Doors to the Poor</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blogopening-day-at-the-supreme-court-could-shut-courthouse-doors-to-the-poor/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=acs-blogopening-day-at-the-supreme-court-could-shut-courthouse-doors-to-the-poor</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blogopening-day-at-the-supreme-court-could-shut-courthouse-doors-to-the-poor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(9/28/2011) Rochelle Bobroff on the significance of Douglas v Independent Living Center case that the Supreme Court  hears Oct. as its very first oral argument for the new term. The case is of vital importance to low income individuals, including older &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blogopening-day-at-the-supreme-court-could-shut-courthouse-doors-to-the-poor/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blogopening-day-at-the-supreme-court-could-shut-courthouse-doors-to-the-poor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACS: In Under-Reported D.C. Circuit Oral Argument, Prominent Republican Judges Suggest Novel Arguments for Upholding Health Care Law&#8217;s Individual Mandate</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-in-under-reported-d-c-circuit-oral-argument-prominent-republican-judges-suggest-novel-arguments-for-upholding-health-care-laws-individual-mandate/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=acs-in-under-reported-d-c-circuit-oral-argument-prominent-republican-judges-suggest-novel-arguments-for-upholding-health-care-laws-individual-mandate</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-in-under-reported-d-c-circuit-oral-argument-prominent-republican-judges-suggest-novel-arguments-for-upholding-health-care-laws-individual-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday, Sept. 23, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard oral arguments on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) individual mandate… The two Republicans on the three-judge panel, Reagan appointee Laurence Silberman &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-in-under-reported-d-c-circuit-oral-argument-prominent-republican-judges-suggest-novel-arguments-for-upholding-health-care-laws-individual-mandate/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-in-under-reported-d-c-circuit-oral-argument-prominent-republican-judges-suggest-novel-arguments-for-upholding-health-care-laws-individual-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACS Blog: Potent Support for the Affordable Care Act Mandate From an Improbable Source</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blogpotent-support-for-the-affordable-care-act-mandate-from-an-improbable-source/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=acs-blogpotent-support-for-the-affordable-care-act-mandate-from-an-improbable-source</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blogpotent-support-for-the-affordable-care-act-mandate-from-an-improbable-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=1402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[6/30/2011 &#8212; In a blog about the 6th District Court of Appeals decision on the health reform law, NSCLC&#8217;s Simon Lazarus writes: &#8220; ..what Judge Sutton thinks about the constitutionality of the mandate actually matters a lot to the future debate &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blogpotent-support-for-the-affordable-care-act-mandate-from-an-improbable-source/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acs-blogpotent-support-for-the-affordable-care-act-mandate-from-an-improbable-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>