<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>National Senior Citizens Law Center &#187; Economic Security Litigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/category/economic-security/economic-security-litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nsclc.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:32:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Clark v Astrue Court Order Restoring Benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-order/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clark-v-astrue-court-order</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Security Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark v Astrue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsclc.org/?p=4989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many as 140,000 Americans nationwide will get their Social Security or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits restored as a result of an order issed by Judge Sidney H. Stein in a federal court in Manhattan April 13, 2012. READ &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-order/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Information for Consumers</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/martinez-information-for-consumers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=martinez-information-for-consumers</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/martinez-information-for-consumers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Martinez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=1240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This page contains material to assist consumers, clients and others in understanding the Martinez Social Security/SSI settlement. The Social Security Administration recently announced that it will delay the timeline sending notices and providing relief to all class members by six months, until summer &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/martinez-information-for-consumers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/martinez-information-for-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Information for Advocates</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/martinez-information-for-advocates/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=martinez-information-for-advocates</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/martinez-information-for-advocates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NSCLC Helps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Martinez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=1225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overpayment Filing Filing to appeal an overpayment on behalf of a client affected by the Martinez settlement consists of sending a letter to the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) on behalf of the client with the warrant data attached. If the &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/martinez-information-for-advocates/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/martinez-information-for-advocates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clark v. Astrue: Nationwide Class Certified</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-nationwide-class-certified/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clark-v-astrue-nationwide-class-certified</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-nationwide-class-certified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Security Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark v Astrue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NATIONWIDE CLASS CERTIFIED IN SSA PROBATION/PAROLE CASE A court in New York has certified a nationwide class in a successful challenge to the Social Security Administration’s policy of suspending or denying Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits whenever &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-nationwide-class-certified/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-nationwide-class-certified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACB v Astrue: Standard Print Notice Not Sufficient for Blind &amp; Visually Impaired</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acb-v-astrue-standard-print-notice-not-sufficient-for-blind-visually-impaired/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=acb-v-astrue-standard-print-notice-not-sufficient-for-blind-visually-impaired</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acb-v-astrue-standard-print-notice-not-sufficient-for-blind-visually-impaired/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Security Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some 3 million blind and visually impaired Social Security beneficiaries &#8212; two thirds over age 80 &#8212; are entitled to receive notices about their benefits in Braille or on a Microsoft CD thanks to a successful lawsuit. However, some 80% &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acb-v-astrue-standard-print-notice-not-sufficient-for-blind-visually-impaired/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/acb-v-astrue-standard-print-notice-not-sufficient-for-blind-visually-impaired/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Francisco Social Security/SSI Martinez Case Media Briefing</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/san-francisco-social-securityssi-martinez-case-media-briefing/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=san-francisco-social-securityssi-martinez-case-media-briefing</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/san-francisco-social-securityssi-martinez-case-media-briefing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Martinez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NSCLC and New America Media co-hosted a media briefing on the successful Martinez class action lawsuit on July 27, 2010. Click here to see the video. Social Security Benefits Wrongly Denied from New America Media on Vimeo. &#160;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/san-francisco-social-securityssi-martinez-case-media-briefing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clark v Astrue: Plaintiffs Move for Class Certification in SSA Probation Case</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-plaintiffs-move-for-class-certification-in-ssa-probation-case/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clark-v-astrue-plaintiffs-move-for-class-certification-in-ssa-probation-case</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-plaintiffs-move-for-class-certification-in-ssa-probation-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 18:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Security Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark v Astrue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plaintiffs have moved for certification of a nationwide class in Clark v. Astrue, (06-cv-15521 SHS, SDNY). the action challenging the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) policy of suspending or denying Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits anytime someone had an &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-plaintiffs-move-for-class-certification-in-ssa-probation-case/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-plaintiffs-move-for-class-certification-in-ssa-probation-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SSA Agrees to Provide Medicare Part B Enrollment Protections to Martinez Class Members</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/ssa-agrees-to-provide-medicare-part-b-enrollment-protections-to-martinez-class-members/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ssa-agrees-to-provide-medicare-part-b-enrollment-protections-to-martinez-class-members</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/ssa-agrees-to-provide-medicare-part-b-enrollment-protections-to-martinez-class-members/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Martinez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to arguments raised by NSCLC and other class counsel, SSA has agreed to use its &#8220;executive discretion&#8221; to ensure that Martinez class members do not experience a lapse in Medicare Part B coverage as their Social Security benefits are restored. &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/ssa-agrees-to-provide-medicare-part-b-enrollment-protections-to-martinez-class-members/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/ssa-agrees-to-provide-medicare-part-b-enrollment-protections-to-martinez-class-members/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clark v Astrue: Court of Appeals Rules SSA Policy on Probation/Parole Violators Unlawful</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-of-appeals-rules-ssa-policy-on-probation-parole-violators-unlawful/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clark-v-astrue-court-of-appeals-rules-ssa-policy-on-probation-parole-violators-unlawful</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-of-appeals-rules-ssa-policy-on-probation-parole-violators-unlawful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Security Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark v Astrue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled that the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) policy of suspending Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits whenever someone has an outstanding warrant for an alleged violation of probation &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-of-appeals-rules-ssa-policy-on-probation-parole-violators-unlawful/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/clark-v-astrue-court-of-appeals-rules-ssa-policy-on-probation-parole-violators-unlawful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SSA Ordered to Offer Blind &amp; Visually Impaired Beneficiaries an Alternative to Standard Print Notices</title>
		<link>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/ssa-ordered-to-offer-blind-visually-impaired-beneficiaries-an-alternative-to-standard-print-notices/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ssa-ordered-to-offer-blind-visually-impaired-beneficiaries-an-alternative-to-standard-print-notices</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/ssa-ordered-to-offer-blind-visually-impaired-beneficiaries-an-alternative-to-standard-print-notices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NanOak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Security Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 504]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerdomain.com/nsclc/?p=3466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A district judge in California has issued a final judgment in a nationwide class action requiring that the Social Security Administration (SSA) offer blind or visually impaired individuals the option of receiving notices and other communications in alternative formats.  American Council &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/ssa-ordered-to-offer-blind-visually-impaired-beneficiaries-an-alternative-to-standard-print-notices/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsclc.org/index.php/ssa-ordered-to-offer-blind-visually-impaired-beneficiaries-an-alternative-to-standard-print-notices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>