In this joint Supreme Court friend of the court brief submitted on January 30, 2012, it is argued that the provisions of the Affordable Care Act affecting those over age 65 should not be affected if the minimum coverage provision is found unconstitutional. NSCLC is joined by AARP, Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc., Medicare Rights Center, National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, and National Council on Aging.
In The News
NSCLC’s Paul Nathanson writes in a New America Media blog that it is crucial that the Social Security Administration communicate with individuals in language that people understand.
NSCLC Helps
Reneto Wilkins lost his SSI benefits and assessed $18,000 in overpayments when he had too much in savings… Read More.
NSCLC on Twitter

RT @ElderLawGuy: Study: Slow growth in health costs will continue http://t.co/jeFigPG7Ox
(about 12 hours ago)

RT @ConsumerVoices: New Tool for Advocates: Continuity of Care in the Dual Eligible Demonstrations http://t.co/RP7801YkkJ
(about 20 hours ago)

RT @MHJCarlson: Big win for @FTC: #SCOTUS rules pay-for-delay deals may break antitrust law. Full decision in FTC v. Actavis: http://t.co/y…
(about 1 day ago)

RT @NCPSSM: "Austerity or Accuracy? Why Seniors Need a CPI-E." http://t.co/5LLg3bGCoa #SocialSecurity #p2
(about 4 days ago)

RT @lmlipman: RT @insideestreet: Is retirement a thing of the past? Heading Back to Work After Retiring http://t.co/ss5qrWMmr9 via @NewsHour
(about 4 days ago)


